思想史:從火到弗洛伊德(出書版),現代,彼得·沃森,全文TXT下載,精彩免費下載

時間:2018-02-03 19:54 /架空歷史 / 編輯:秋雲
小說主人公是Ibid.,Op.cit.,en的小說是思想史:從火到弗洛伊德(出書版),它的作者是彼得·沃森寫的一本未來、歷史、法師風格的小說,書中主要講述了:[24] Isaiah Berlin,The Sense of Reality:Studies in Ideas and Their History,edite...

思想史:從火到弗洛伊德(出書版)

主角名稱:anOp.cit.Ibid.en

需用時間:約15天讀完

閱讀指數:10分

《思想史:從火到弗洛伊德(出書版)》線上閱讀

《思想史:從火到弗洛伊德(出書版)》精彩章節

[24] Isaiah Berlin,The Sense of Reality:Studies in Ideas and Their History,edited by Henry Hardy,London:Chatto&Windus,1996,pp.168—169.

[25] Jared Diamond,Guns,Germs and Steel,London:Jonathan Cape,1997,pp.200—202.

[26] Jacob Bronowski and Bruce Mazlish,The Western Intellectual Tradition,New York:Harper&Brothers,1960,p.495.

[27] Barnes,Op.cit.,p.720.

[28] Bronowski and Mazlish,Op.cit.,p.259.

[29] Arthur O.Lovejoy,The Great Chain of Being,Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1936/1964,p.23.

[30] Edward P.Mahoney,‘Lovejoy and the hierarchy of being’,Journal of the History of Ideas,vol.48,1987,p.211.

[31] Lovejoy,Op.cit.,p.55.

[32] Ibid.,p.89.

[33] Ibid.,p.91.

[34] Ibid.,p.201.

[35] Ibid.,p.211.

[36] Ibid.,p.232.

[37] Ibid.,p.241.

[38] Paul Robinson,‘Symbols at an exhibition’,New York Times,12 November 1998,p.12.

[39] Gladys Gordon-Bournique,‘A.O.Lovejoy and the history of ideas’,Journal of the History of Ideas,vol.48,1987,p.209.

[40] 這同黑格爾所稱的“哲學命題”相似。See:Donald A.Kelley,‘What is happening to the history of ideas?’,Journal of the History of Ideas,vol.51,1990,p.4.

[41] Philip P.Wiener(editor),Dictionary of the History of Ideas,four volumes,New York:Charles Scribner’s Sons,1973.

[42] Kelley,Op.cit.,pp.3—26.

[43] James Thrower,The Alternative Tradition,The Hague:Mouton,1980.

[44] Jacquetta Hawkes(editor),The World of the Past,London:Thames&Hudson,1963,p.29.

[45] Ibid.,p.33.

[46] James Sackett,‘Human antiquity and the Old Stone Age:the 19th-Century background to palaeoanthropology’,Evolutionary Anthropology,vol.9,issue 1,2000,pp.37—49.

[47] Hawkes,Op.cit.,pp.30—34 and pp.147—148.

[48] Ibid.,p.27.

[49] Glyn Daniel,One Hundred and Fifty Years of Archaeology(second edition),London:Duckworth,1975,pp.25—26.

[50] Bruce G.Trigger,A History of Archaeological Thought,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1989,p.53.

[51] Ian Tattersall,The Fossil Trail,Oxford and New York:Oxford University Press,1995/1996,p.8;and Hawkes,Op.cit.,pp.25—26.

[52] Hawkes,Op.cit.,pp.28—29.

[53] Sackett,Op.cit.,p.46.

[54] Peter J.Bowler,Evolution:The History of an Idea(revised edition),Berkeley,Los Angeles and London:University of California Press,1989,pp.32—33.

[55] Trigger,Op.cit.,pp.92—93.

[56] James A.Secord,Victorian Sensation:The Extraordinary Publication,Reception,and Secret Authorship of‘Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation’,Chicago and London:University of Chicago Press,2000,p.146.

[57] Ibid.,p.105.

[58] Peter Burke,‘Images as evidence in seventeenth-Century Europe,’Journal of the History of Ideas,vol.64,2003,pp.273—296.

[59] Burke,Op.cit.,pp.283—284.

[60] Trigger,Op.cit.,p.74.

[61] Ibid.,p.76.

[62] Sackett,Op.cit.,p.48.

[63] Ibid.

[64] George Schaller,The Last Panda,Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1993,p.8.

[65] Robert J.Wenke,Patterns in Prehistory,Oxford:Oxford University Press,1990,pp.119—120.

[66] But see Stephen Oppenheimer,Out of Eden:The Peopling of the World,London:Constable,2003,p.10.

[67] Journal of Human Evolution,vol.43,2002,p.831,reported in New Scientist,4 January 2003,p.16.當然,使用木質工的行為,如果存在的話,是無法留存下來的。

[68] Paul Mellars and Chris Stringer,The Human Revolution,Edinburgh:Edinburgh University Press,1989,p.70 and chapter six,‘Multi-regional evolution:the fossil alternative Eden’,by Milford H.Wolpoff.現在人們並不認為黑猩猩同人類的關係像以認定的那樣密切。See New Scientist,28 September 2002,p.20.最近的卻仍然有爭議的證據認為,黑猩猩同人類之間的分離出現在400萬到1000萬年。See Bernard Wood,‘Who are we?’,New Scientist,26 October 2002,pp.44—47.

[69] New Scientist,13 July 2002,p.6;and 13 July 2002,p.6.正如伯納德·伍德指出來的,久拉普沙漠位於東非大裂谷以西150公里處,這意味著,這一地方可能再也不能被認為是早期人類的唯一家園。‘Who are we?’,New Scientist,26 October 2002,p.47.薩赫勒人查德種來被認為是早期類人猿的一種,而不是人類的祖先。See Times Higher Educational Supplement,25 October 2002,p.19.2000年,一則報發現的一塊骨,被認為是我們距今600萬年的“千年祖先”的遺骸,備直立姿。New Scientist,15 December 2000,p.5.斯蒂芬·奧本海默說,“兩足直立”最早的“清晰證據”在400萬年的湖畔南方古猿骸骨中可以看見。Oppenheimer,Op.cit.,p.5.

[70] Oppenheimer,Op.cit.,p.11.

[71] Steven Mithen,The Prehistory of the Mind,London:Thames&Hudson,1996,p.238.

[72] Richard G.Klein with Blake Edward,The Dawn of Human Culture,New York:John Wiley,2002,p.56.

[73] 另一理論認為,直立姿使頭部更加稚篓,透過頭更有助於在非洲炎熱地帶散熱。Oppenheimer,Op.cit.,p.5.

(53 / 123)
思想史:從火到弗洛伊德(出書版)

思想史:從火到弗洛伊德(出書版)

作者:彼得·沃森 型別:架空歷史 完結: 是

★★★★★
作品打分作品詳情
推薦專題大家正在讀
熱門